big pharma

Apr

2023

Big Pharma and Nashville Shooting

How To Taper Off Pharmaceutical Drugs

or How to Get Back to Normal

or Why On Earth Should One Not Do Pharmaceutical Drugs

or What Is Killing North America

or School Shootings and Big Pharma

or What Is The Most Dangerous Age Group For Anti Depressants?

A good friend recently conveyed his story coming off anti depressants. The telling was considerably shorter than the coming off. Well, sort of. After being on an anti depressant for a few years and feeling that it was making him worse than before, he went cold turkey.

This is very difficult for anyone. It is also extremely dangerous. Not recommended. These anti-depressants are horribly addictive. The professionals that monitor tapering off advise doing so in very small increments over weeks and months, sometimes years.

Most times the reactions of coming off can be far worse than the effects of the drugs themselves. And most times much worse than not doing them in the first place.

Some of the withdrawal symptoms can include headaches, burning, electric-like or shock-like sensations, insomnia, drowsiness, not feeling like oneself (a disconnected feeling), dissociation, impotence, tingling, fatigue, nausea, headache, light-headedness, chills, body aches, vomiting, cramps, diarrhea, dizziness, vertigo, nightmares, vivid dreams, light-headiness to name just a few. Withdrawal symptoms can last from weeks to months.

“…can be notoriously difficult to quit because stopping can produce withdrawal-like symptoms referred to as "discontinuation syndrome.”

Very Well Mind

One of the more prominent doctors that encourage tapering off pharmaceuticals but also give an exact science as to doing so, is Dr Peter Breggin. Dr Breggin wrote a book dedicated to the subject. It’s called Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal. Read his article here: Dr Breggin Book.

Another doctor that has been a great help to a great many tapering off anti depressants and anti anxiety pills is Dr Kelly Brogan. Dr Brogan stresses the need for coming off these drugs properly. Her website is filled with natural, holistic ways of being healthy, sane and stable without the need for mind altering drugs. Spend some time there.

If you read through the websites of Dr Breggin and Dr Brogan, you will see some of the dangers of anti-depressants and anti anxiety pills. Some of the more dangerous side effects of anti-depressants are ‘depression’, ‘suicide ideation’, ‘panic disorder’ and violent behaviour.

“…for 15 to 24 year-olds, the findings were more grim: There was a very substantial increase – 43 percent – in their risk of committing violent crimes while on antidepressants.” - The Heart and Mind Institute

So, in light of the recent shooting in Nashville, Tennessee by 28-year-old Audrey Hale - she was a being treated for a ‘mental disorder’. This has been the case with far the majority of school shootings. Given the side effects of the drugs likely given plus other treatments it is far from surprising that she acted out this violent ideation.

An excerpt from risk.org explains it a little more thoroughly.

“Dissociative experiences

Dissociative experiences refer to unusual changes in perception and feelings, often involving a sense of detachment.

Antidepressants can cause a number of dissociative experiences including:

▪ Amnesia

▪ Déjà vu

▪ Depersonalization

▪ Derealization

▪ Hallucinations

▪ Prominent nightmares or lucid dreaming

Depersonalisation is an experience of feeling strange and unusual, almost as though you are not really yourself anymore, or that you are in a kind of a dream or haze.

Derealisation refers to a similar set of feelings and perceptions, but in this case it is the world itself that seems strange or unreal; everything may seem far away or staged in some way – as though life is being watched rather than lived.

Depersonalisation and derealisation are relatively common on antidepressants.”

Remember that the above are side effects of the drugs, not the reason for doing them. Feelings and actions created by taking the drugs. So, the most dangerous age group for anti depressants and anti anxiety are the young.

If you are truly interested in finding out more I’ve put together a few references:

Resources On Psychiatry

Mar

2023

Nutrient Depletion and Drugs

Nov

2021

James Bond and Big Pharma

Who is The Real Villain?

Anthony Fauci? Goldfinger? Bill Gates?

James Bond villains pale in comparison to the unfettered evil displayed by the malevolent bipeds controlling the pharmaceutical industry. If you are looking for the devil on Earth, look no further. Poor excuses for human beings, these individuals have been directly responsible for the deaths of millions. They deserve a spot next to the likes of Hitler, Pol Pot, and Stalin. There is no kindness here.

I’m about 150 pages into Robert F Kennedy’s book, ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’. It is ostensibly about Fauci. But really, while naming names and connections, fully annotated, the pages of the book display how rulers in the military/industrial complex and the pharmaceutical companies in the United States and other countries waste hundreds of thousands and even millions of lives [read more]for money and power. For them, there is never enough.

Cures for Covid in abundance.

Kennedy outlines how certain individuals within and controlling Big Pharma around the world suppress proven, safe solutions to coronaviruses that would have cut the death rate in countries like the United States by 80% or more and without the devastating effects of lockdowns. Kennedy documents how this suppression of data and the creation of propaganda about the “harms” of entirely safe drugs started even before the rest of world became aware of Covid 19. Joseph Goebbels would be so proud.

The book documents the timelines of propaganda attacks on safe effective drugs like Ivermectin and Hydoxychloroquine."

All these deaths to justify the need for more money and power by a few individuals that know that they are above the law.

At the moment of this writing, most places are sold out of the hard cover book. One can easily purchase and download the digital version. A couple of benefits of the digital version is that one can click on the annotations and go directly to the source of the information. Apparently, they will also update the book through a QR code as well as more information becomes available.

Here is the link to purchase from Amazon:

The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F Kennedy

If you are in Canada get it at Chapters/Indigo (download):

Kobo Chapters

I’ll update this article or write another as I move through the book.[/read]

Nov

2021

Restoring Study 329

Is Pfizer Being Just a Tad Hypocritical?

Or is it just the money?

I took this straight from Bobby Fiddiman’s Facebook page. Bobby has been fighting the good fight against the pharmaceutical industry for many years. Below his notes, I’ve added a link to a study he references. This study shows how pharmaceutical companies hide the real results of their research.

[read more]

“A word to those who don't move in the same circles as I do.

If you want to analyse selected data for Pfizer’s trial, you will have to wait until May 2025 before you can request them. Even in 2025, Pfizer will not release the individual Case Report Forms (CRFs) from their clinical trials. (Reference to Vaccine safety studies.)

The only time CRFs have been accessed by anyone outside of the drug industry was for a restoration study. The original study showed a popular antidepressant (Paxil) was safe and effective in children. However, after gaining access to the CRFs many years later, the restoration team found it was the complete opposite. Paxil was neither safe or effective in children, in fact it induced thoughts of self-harm and suicide and put children at risk when taking it. [see ‘Restoring Study 329’ below]

By 2025, Pfizer will have sold hundreds of millions of doses and earned billions of dollars.

You, I, the FDA, CDC, The WHO, will never be able to see the CRFs. All you will be able to access is studies in journals written, on the surface, by key opinion leaders known as experts in the field.

[This next is very important data to know when researching Big Pharma’s research.]

However, these key opinion leaders don't actually write these studies. They are drafted by PR firms hired by the drug companies. The key opinion leaders (without seeing the CRFs) just add their name to the articles, which are normally posted in medical journals. These articles are then picked up by mainstream media and touted as truth.

Drug companies claim they don't release the CRFs because of proprietary rights and patient confidentiality. Now, tell me if you think it's right that you, yourself, fill forms and have to include your medical information (whether or not you've been juiced)? Shouldn't that be confidential as well? Shouldn't you have the right not to carry papers or Apps with your medical information?

You can tout the pandemic as your excuse for compliance all you want - speak to Pfizer about it - ask them to release the CRFs - see what response they give you.

This is what you are all up against.

Don't believe me?

Research it - make me a liar.

Facebook will, no doubt add a COVID warning to this post when, in actual fact, they should be adding a Pfizer warning.

Lesson over.

~ Fid”

Restoring Study 329 - A Bit of History

The article on the other side of this link exposes how the pharmaceutical company Glaxo-SmithKline hid real research behind paid hacks calling themselves scientists.

In the original study, called Restoring Study 329:

“In 2001, a pharmaceutical industry-conducted trial[1] published in the most prestigious American journal of child psychiatry reported that paroxetine was more effective than placebo in treating major depression in 275 adolescents. The study was conducted by the drug manufacturer in typical fashion: dozens of clinical sites were used throughout the country to recruit patients, the data were analyzed in-house by statistical employees of the company, and academic leaders in the field reviewed and revised the paper and became its authors, the first being the chairman of the department of psychiatry at Brown University …and became its authors …!"
https://study329.org/in-the-news/

So, the Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at Brown University penned his name to the study to give it credibility? He did not have all of the research to hand:

“The core problem is that the process for safety and effectiveness testing is left to drug manufacturers, who have a vested interest in seeing positive results, without the medical and scientific community being able to scrutinize what they are doing.”

So, knowing that the drug, Paxil, fared no better than the placebo in trials, Glaxo-SmithKline then marketed and sold the product.

And after over 20 years on the market, Glaxo-SmithKline paid out 3 billion dollars in fines for this crap. Rarely do all the full data on the research come to light. And they’re not ever willingly provided by the pharmaceutical companies.

Bobby’s argument here is that we will not be allowed to know the real research data on Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine until 2025 and that’s WAY too late if there is danger there.

The Real Problem

The real problem is that Big Pharma has a history of editing its research on drugs to show benefits and hiding or making little of harm or damages they can cause.

One of the scariest aspects with Paxil is that it is still out there. You can get it under many names: Tagonis, Eutimil, Riva-paroxetine, MeradelParoneurin… there are about another fifty.

Do your own research into how these companies do their research. If you do this, you will not be so eager to believe your doctor or the advertising. that touts the benefits of drugs like Paxil or some of the recent products of companies like Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson.

[/read]

Sep

2021

WHO Redefines ‘Herd Immunity’

World Health Organization Redefines ‘Herd Immunity’

I recently noticed on Instagram that the hash tag #naturalimmunity no longer existed. You can tag a post with that but if you try and go to it, nada. You can’t. It has been deleted, made gone from the Instagram world.

I then started doing some research into Herd Immunity.

During this further research, I discovered the idea of ‘Herd Immunity’ is still there. But it has been completely redefined by The World Health Organization.

[read more]

“The World Health Organization, for reasons unknown, has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology: herd immunity … Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (SARS-CoV-1). The reason is that when a virus kills its host … the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads … When it happens to enough people … the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable … This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years … And the discovery of this fascinating dynamic in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century. We kept calm. We managed viruses with medical professionals: doctor/patient relationships … Until one day, this strange institution called the World Health Organization … has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet- like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.”

from The American Institute for Economic Research

No more Natural Immunity?

So they take the idea of natural immunity out of the definition of ‘herd immunity’ and replace it with, well, vaccines.

This is right out of the propaganda playbook of redefining words. George Orwell would have been proud. (Sarcasm) This is standard practice of modern Socialist tyrants.

Why would the World Health Organization (WHO) do something like this? Money. Follow the money. That part is actually pretty easy. With the WHO pushing vaccines instead of health, who benefits?

Some of the biggest financial supporters of the World Health Organization:

GlaxoSmithKline: over $7 million in 2017

Bayer AG: Over $1 million in 2017

Hoffman - La Roche: (Swiss Pharmaceutical) $2.6 million

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: $23 million

These people and companies make many times more than this back. It’s been an excellent investment. The pharmaceutical companies the Gates Foundation have made billions from vaccines.

Another short quote from same article above:

“This change at WHO ignores and even wipes out 100 years of medical advances in virology, immunology and epidemiology. It is thoroughly unscientific - shilling for the vaccine industry in exactly the way the conspiracy theorists say that WHO has been doing since the beginning of this pandemic.
What’s even stranger is the claim that vaccine protects people from a virus rather than exposing them to it. What’s amazing about this claim is that a vaccine works precisely by firing up the immune system through exposure … this has been known for centuries. There is simply no way for medical science completely to replace the human immune system. It can only game it via what used to be called inoculation.”

So, If definitions and 'facts' can be so easily changed online, perhaps it is time for us to go back to actual books for research!

Definitions

Here are the 'before' and 'after' definitions of Herd Immunity from The World Health Organization website:

Before the definition was changed this was the definition of Herd Immunity on their website:

‘Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.’

It should be noted that “immunity developed through previous infection” is the way it’s worked since humans have been alive. Apparently, according to WHO, that’s no longer the case. In October 2020, here’s their updated definition of herd immunity, which is now a “concept used for vaccination”:

This is the NEW definition per The World Health Organization:

“Herd immunity”, also known as “population immunity”, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as “antibodies”, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but—crucially—vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission. Visit our webpage on COVID-19 and vaccines for more detail. With herd immunity, the vast majority of a population are vaccinated … lowering the … overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population. As a result, not every single person needs to be vaccinated to be protected, which helps ensure vulnerable groups who cannot get vaccinated are kept safe. This is called herd immunity.… The percentage of people who need to have antibodies in order to achieve herd immunity against a particular disease varies with each disease. For example, herd immunity against measles requires 95% of a population to be vaccinated. The remaining 5% will be protected by the fact that measles will not spread among those who are vaccinated. For polio, the threshold is about 80%. Achieving herd immunity with safe and effective vaccines makes diseases rarer and saves lives."

From the book: Truth About Covid by Dr Joseph Mercola

Completely different definitions.

No more natural immunity in the newer definition! Oops.

Add to the fact that Vaccine companies (read pharmaceutical companies) have been, for years, exempt from liabilities. They cannot be sued for any damages caused by vaccines. In the USA any lawsuits related to vaccines are defended by the Department of Justice and in the rare instance there is a payout, the money comes from taxpayers, not Big Pharma.

Millions upon millions of dollars have gone into lobbying for laws and creating propaganda to make vaccines the solution instead of natural immunity.[/read]