big pharma

The Lost Art of Looking – Observation

The Lost Art of Looking – Observation

Observation - Looking - A Lost Art

The majority of people just don’t look.

This is a bit of a rant. 

I know way too many people that will only ‘see’ things through the filter of the media.  Whatever science the media claims to be so, then that is so, no matter what they see in from of them. 

I’ve noticed this quite dramatically over the last three years.  A friend’s daughter who I chat with from time to time is fourteen years old.  She is in a public high school and gets ostracized from groups because she actually observes things.  She says to me “People just don’t look!”  She does find it a bit tough but she refuses to compromise with what she sees in front of her.

Like a doctor friend of mine that for most of his career was constantly being investigated by the Ontario College of Physicians.  He would not randomly give out drugs. He had stacks of books in his office on healthy ways to solve medical problems.  Big Pharma, I’m sure hated him for this.  And believe it or not they control, at least partially, the ‘Health’ government entities.  Like the CDC and FDA in the United States and Health Canada. 

I’m pretty sure that there was no one at some pharmaceutical company sitting there specifically saying “We gotta get this doctor!”  But the people in Health Canada and the FDA and the like that get supported or get bonuses from Big Pharma are supported and get bonuses because they target people like my doctor friend. 

This was taken to the extreme over the last few years.  If any doctor had a cure or suggested alternatives or even questioned the position put forward by politicians and Big Pharma, they were immediately censured.  And censored.  And these attacks, cowed others so that they would fall in line. 

When a politician cites ‘everybody knows’ and I know dozens of people that disagree with what that politician is stating, then we have a  problem.  The problem is that way too many people listen to what that politician is saying instead of observing for themselves what is going on around them. 

If one has a different opinion or even better, that person does some research or looks around to see if something is true or not, if they, in any way question what the leading politicians or media says, they are slammed, one and all, as being ‘anti-science’.

One size does not fit all. 

One cannot generalize.

There are knowledgable doctors and learned scientists that disagree with much of what is put forth currently by politicians, the media and Big Pharma. 

Climate Change

Vaccines - Viruses

War - Russia - Ukraine - USA

Don’t question any of these things. 

Common knowledge in a troubled marriage: “there are two sides to every story.” 

But, again, people don’t want to look.

I think, sometimes, that this has a lot to do with our education system.  Dumbing us down.  Growing up I was astounded as to how well read my father and his generation were.  And now I’m astounded as to how well read my generation are compared to the current generation.  It is so easy to con people that don’t know history. 

There is a great book on this called Dumbing Us Down by John Taylor Gatto.  A fairly short read.  And brilliant.    

There is a quote attributed to Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), I’m pretty sure this is not exactly what he said:

“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it,
unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”

But to do this, you have to look.  Sometimes, as silly as it seems, one has to practice looking.  Something as simple as going for a walk, talking to someone new.  Get away from newsfeeds and the like.  It’s refreshing.  One finds out how wonderful people are. 

The Art of Looking.

If you would like to do some proper research in spite of what your 'friends' might say, here is some good reference material.  List of books/authors

Dumbing Us Down by John Taylor Gatto

Inconvenient Facts by Gregory Wrightstone

Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries, MD

Posted by Marty in Blog, 0 comments
Big Pharma and Nashville Shooting

Big Pharma and Nashville Shooting

How To Taper Off Pharmaceutical Drugs

or How to Get Back to Normal

or Why On Earth Should One Not Do Pharmaceutical Drugs

or What Is Killing North America

or School Shootings and Big Pharma

or What Is The Most Dangerous Age Group For Anti Depressants?

A good friend recently conveyed his story coming off anti depressants.  The telling was considerably shorter than the coming off.  Well, sort of.  After being on an anti depressant for a few years and feeling that it was making him worse than before, he went cold turkey

This is very difficult for anyone.  It is also extremely dangerous.  Not recommended.  These anti-depressants are horribly addictive.  The professionals that monitor tapering off advise doing so in very small increments over weeks and months, sometimes years. 

Most times the reactions of coming off can be far worse than the effects of the drugs themselves.  And most times much worse than not doing them in the first place. 

Some of the withdrawal symptoms can include headaches, burning, electric-like or shock-like sensations, insomnia, drowsiness, not feeling like oneself (a disconnected feeling), dissociation, impotence, tingling, fatigue, nausea, headache, light-headedness, chills, body aches, vomiting, cramps, diarrhea, dizziness, vertigo, nightmares, vivid dreams, light-headiness to name just a few.  Withdrawal symptoms can last from weeks to months.

“…can be notoriously difficult to quit because stopping can produce withdrawal-like symptoms referred to as "discontinuation syndrome.”

Very Well Mind 

One of the more prominent doctors that encourage tapering off pharmaceuticals but also give an exact science as to doing so, is Dr Peter Breggin.  Dr Breggin wrote a book dedicated to the subject.  It’s called Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal.  Read his article here: Dr Breggin Book.  

Another doctor that has been a great help to a great many tapering off anti depressants and anti anxiety pills is Dr Kelly Brogan.  Dr Brogan stresses the need for coming off these drugs properly.  Her website is filled with natural, holistic ways of being healthy, sane and stable without the need for mind altering drugs.  Spend some time there.

If you read through the websites of Dr Breggin and Dr Brogan, you will see some of the dangers of anti-depressants and anti anxiety pills.  Some of the more dangerous side effects of anti-depressants are ‘depression’, ‘suicide ideation’,  ‘panic disorder’ and violent behaviour.

“…for 15 to 24 year-olds, the findings were more grim: There was a very substantial increase – 43 percent – in their risk of committing violent crimes while on antidepressants.”  - The Heart and Mind Institute 

So, in light of the recent shooting in Nashville, Tennessee by 28-year-old Audrey Hale - she was a being treated for a ‘mental disorder’.  This has been the case with far the majority of school shootings.  Given the side effects of the drugs likely given plus other treatments it is far from surprising that she acted out this violent ideation. 

An excerpt from risk.org explains it a little more thoroughly.  

“Dissociative experiences

Dissociative experiences refer to unusual changes in perception and feelings, often involving a sense of detachment.

Antidepressants can cause a number of dissociative experiences including:

Amnesia

Déjà vu

Depersonalization

Derealization

Hallucinations

Prominent nightmares or lucid dreaming

Depersonalisation is an experience of feeling strange and unusual, almost as though you are not really yourself anymore, or that you are in a kind of a dream or haze.

Derealisation refers to a similar set of feelings and perceptions, but in this case it is the world itself that seems strange or unreal; everything may seem far away or staged in some way – as though life is being watched rather than lived.

Depersonalisation and derealisation are relatively common on antidepressants.”

Remember that the above are side effects of the drugs, not the reason for doing them.  Feelings and actions created by taking the drugs.  So, the most dangerous age group for anti depressants and anti anxiety are the young. 

If you are truly interested in finding out more I’ve put together a few references:

Resources On Psychiatry 

Posted by Marty in Blog, 0 comments
Nutrient Depletion and Drugs

Nutrient Depletion and Drugs

If you really want to know how various prescribed drugs can affect other nutrients, please check out this website.  Vitamins you take and nutrients in your food can be affected differently by various pharmaceuticals.  If your health has been adversely affected while on some needed drug here you will find some very useful information as to how you can get your body back to battery.

Find Deficiencies at MyTavin

Posted by Marty in Blog, 0 comments
James Bond and Big Pharma

James Bond and Big Pharma

Who is The Real Villain?

Anthony Fauci? Goldfinger?  Bill Gates?

James Bond villains pale in comparison to the unfettered evil displayed by the malevolent bipeds controlling the pharmaceutical industry.  If you are looking for the devil on Earth, look no further.  Poor excuses for human beings, these individuals have been directly responsible for the deaths of millions.  They deserve a spot next to the likes of Hitler, Pol Pot, and Stalin.  There is no kindness here.  

I’m about 150 pages into Robert F Kennedy’s book, ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’.  It is ostensibly about Fauci.  But really, while naming names and connections, fully annotated, the pages of the book display how rulers in the military/industrial complex and the pharmaceutical companies in the United States and other countries waste hundreds of thousands and even millions of lives [read more]for money and power.  For them, there is never enough.  

Cures for Covid in abundance.

Kennedy outlines how certain individuals within and controlling Big Pharma around the world suppress proven, safe solutions to coronaviruses that would have cut the death rate in countries like the United States by 80% or more and without the devastating effects of lockdowns.  Kennedy documents how this suppression of data and the creation of propaganda about the “harms” of entirely safe drugs started even before the rest of world became aware of Covid 19.  Joseph Goebbels would be so proud.

The book documents the timelines of propaganda attacks on safe effective drugs like Ivermectin and Hydoxychloroquine."  

All these deaths to justify the need for more money and power by a few individuals that know that they are above the law. 

At the moment of this writing, most places are sold out of the hard cover book.  One can easily purchase and download the digital version.  A couple of benefits of the digital version is that one can click on the annotations and go directly to the source of the information.  Apparently, they will also update the book through a QR code as well as more information becomes available.   

Here is the link to purchase from Amazon:

The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F Kennedy

If you are in Canada get it at Chapters/Indigo (download):

Kobo Chapters

I’ll update this article or write another as I move through the book.[/read]

Death by Doctors

#robertfkennedy #realanthonyfauci #therealanthonyfauci #bigpharma

Posted by Marty in Blog, 0 comments
Restoring Study 329

Restoring Study 329

Is Pfizer Being Just a Tad Hypocritical?

Or is it just the money?

I took this straight from Bobby Fiddiman’s Facebook page.  Bobby has been fighting the good fight against the pharmaceutical industry for many years.  Below his notes, I’ve added a link to a study he references.  This study shows how pharmaceutical companies hide the real results of their research.

[read more]

“A word to those who don't move in the same circles as I do.

If you want to analyse selected data for Pfizer’s trial, you will have to wait until May 2025 before you can request them. Even in 2025, Pfizer will not release the individual Case Report Forms (CRFs) from their clinical trials.  (Reference to Vaccine safety studies.)

The only time CRFs have been accessed by anyone outside of the drug industry was for a restoration study. The original study showed a popular antidepressant (Paxil) was safe and effective in children. However, after gaining access to the CRFs many years later, the restoration team found it was the complete opposite. Paxil was neither safe or effective in children, in fact it induced thoughts of self-harm and suicide and put children at risk when taking it. [see ‘Restoring Study 329’ below]

By 2025, Pfizer will have sold hundreds of millions of doses and earned billions of dollars.


You, I, the FDA, CDC, The WHO, will never be able to see the CRFs. All you will be able to access is studies in journals written, on the surface, by key opinion leaders known as experts in the field.

[This next is very important data to know when researching Big Pharma’s research.]

However, these key opinion leaders don't actually write these studies. They are drafted by PR firms hired by the drug companies. The key opinion leaders (without seeing the CRFs) just add their name to the articles, which are normally posted in medical journals. These articles are then picked up by mainstream media and touted as truth.

Drug companies claim they don't release the CRFs because of proprietary rights and patient confidentiality. Now, tell me if you think it's right that you, yourself, fill forms and have to include your medical information (whether or not you've been juiced)? Shouldn't that be confidential as well? Shouldn't you have the right not to carry papers or Apps with your medical information?

You can tout the pandemic as your excuse for compliance all you want - speak to Pfizer about it - ask them to release the CRFs - see what response they give you.

This is what you are all up against.

Don't believe me?

Research it - make me a liar.

Facebook will, no doubt add a COVID warning to this post when, in actual fact, they should be adding a Pfizer warning.

Lesson over.

~ Fid”

Restoring Study 329 - A Bit of History

The article on the other side of this link exposes how the pharmaceutical company Glaxo-SmithKline hid real research behind paid hacks calling themselves scientists. 

In the original study, called Restoring Study 329:

“In 2001, a pharmaceutical industry-conducted trial[1] published in the most prestigious American journal of child psychiatry reported that paroxetine was more effective than placebo in treating major depression in 275 adolescents. The study was conducted by the drug manufacturer in typical fashion: dozens of clinical sites were used throughout the country to recruit patients, the data were analyzed in-house by statistical employees of the company, and academic leaders in the field reviewed and revised the paper and became its authors, the first being the chairman of the department of psychiatry at Brown University …and became its authors …!"
https://study329.org/in-the-news/

So, the Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at Brown University penned his name to the study to give it credibility?  He did not have all of the research to hand:

“The core problem is that the process for safety and effectiveness testing is left to drug manufacturers, who have a vested interest in seeing positive results, without the medical and scientific community being able to scrutinize what they are doing.”

So, knowing that the drug, Paxil, fared no better than the placebo in trials, Glaxo-SmithKline then marketed and sold the product. 

And after over 20 years on the market, Glaxo-SmithKline paid out 3 billion dollars in fines for this crap.  Rarely do all the full data on the research come to light.  And they’re not ever willingly provided by the pharmaceutical companies. 

Bobby’s argument here is that we will not be allowed to know the real research data on Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine until 2025 and that’s WAY too late if there is danger there.

The Real Problem

The real problem is that Big Pharma has a history of editing its research on drugs to show benefits and hiding or making little of harm or damages they can cause.

One of the scariest aspects with Paxil is that it is still out there. You can get it under many names: Tagonis, Eutimil, Riva-paroxetine, MeradelParoneurin… there are about another fifty.

Do your own research into how these companies do their research.  If you do this, you will not be so eager to believe your doctor or the advertising. that touts the benefits of drugs like Paxil or some of the recent products of companies like Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson.

[/read]

#study329 #pfizer #glaxosmithkline #paxil #johnsonandjohnson

Posted by Marty in Blog, 0 comments