World Health Organization Redefines ‘Herd Immunity’
I recently noticed on Instagram that the hash tag #naturalimmunity no longer existed. You can tag a post with that but if you try and go to it, nada. You can’t. It has been deleted, made gone from the Instagram world.
I then started doing some research into Herd Immunity.
During this further research, I discovered the idea of ‘Herd Immunity’ is still there. But it has been completely redefined by The World Health Organization.
[read more]
“The World Health Organization, for reasons unknown, has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology: herd immunity … Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (SARS-CoV-1). The reason is that when a virus kills its host … the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads … When it happens to enough people … the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable … This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years … And the discovery of this fascinating dynamic in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century. We kept calm. We managed viruses with medical professionals: doctor/patient relationships … Until one day, this strange institution called the World Health Organization … has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet- like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.”
from The American Institute for Economic Research
No more Natural Immunity?
So they take the idea of natural immunity out of the definition of ‘herd immunity’ and replace it with, well, vaccines.
This is right out of the propaganda playbook of redefining words. George Orwell would have been proud. (Sarcasm) This is standard practice of modern Socialist tyrants.
Why would the World Health Organization (WHO) do something like this? Money. Follow the money. That part is actually pretty easy. With the WHO pushing vaccines instead of health, who benefits?
Some of the biggest financial supporters of the World Health Organization:
GlaxoSmithKline: over $7 million in 2017
Bayer AG: Over $1 million in 2017
Hoffman - La Roche: (Swiss Pharmaceutical) $2.6 million
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: $23 million
These people and companies make many times more than this back. It’s been an excellent investment. The pharmaceutical companies the Gates Foundation have made billions from vaccines.
Another short quote from same article above:
“This change at WHO ignores and even wipes out 100 years of medical advances in virology, immunology and epidemiology. It is thoroughly unscientific - shilling for the vaccine industry in exactly the way the conspiracy theorists say that WHO has been doing since the beginning of this pandemic.
What’s even stranger is the claim that vaccine protects people from a virus rather than exposing them to it. What’s amazing about this claim is that a vaccine works precisely by firing up the immune system through exposure … this has been known for centuries. There is simply no way for medical science completely to replace the human immune system. It can only game it via what used to be called inoculation.”
So, If definitions and 'facts' can be so easily changed online, perhaps it is time for us to go back to actual books for research!
Definitions
Here are the 'before' and 'after' definitions of Herd Immunity from The World Health Organization website:
Before the definition was changed this was the definition of Herd Immunity on their website:
‘Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.’
It should be noted that “immunity developed through previous infection” is the way it’s worked since humans have been alive. Apparently, according to WHO, that’s no longer the case. In October 2020, here’s their updated definition of herd immunity, which is now a “concept used for vaccination”:
This is the NEW definition per The World Health Organization:
“Herd immunity”, also known as “population immunity”, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as “antibodies”, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but—crucially—vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission. Visit our webpage on COVID-19 and vaccines for more detail. With herd immunity, the vast majority of a population are vaccinated … lowering the … overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population. As a result, not every single person needs to be vaccinated to be protected, which helps ensure vulnerable groups who cannot get vaccinated are kept safe. This is called herd immunity.… The percentage of people who need to have antibodies in order to achieve herd immunity against a particular disease varies with each disease. For example, herd immunity against measles requires 95% of a population to be vaccinated. The remaining 5% will be protected by the fact that measles will not spread among those who are vaccinated. For polio, the threshold is about 80%. Achieving herd immunity with safe and effective vaccines makes diseases rarer and saves lives."
From the book: Truth About Covid by Dr Joseph Mercola
Completely different definitions.
No more natural immunity in the newer definition! Oops.
Add to the fact that Vaccine companies (read pharmaceutical companies) have been, for years, exempt from liabilities. They cannot be sued for any damages caused by vaccines. In the USA any lawsuits related to vaccines are defended by the Department of Justice and in the rare instance there is a payout, the money comes from taxpayers, not Big Pharma.
Millions upon millions of dollars have gone into lobbying for laws and creating propaganda to make vaccines the solution instead of natural immunity.[/read]